Items
No. |
Item |
2. |
Minutes PDF 140 KB
To approve, as a correct record, the minutes
of the meeting of the Cabinet held on 02 October 2023.
|
3. |
Public Questions and Statements
To receive questions and statements from the
public, if any.
|
4. |
Declarations of Interest PDF 721 KB
Members are asked at this stage to declare any
interests that they may have in any of the following items on the
agenda. The Code of Conduct for Members requries that declarations
include the nature of the interest and whether it is a disclosable
pecuniary interest (see attached guidance and flowchart)
|
5. |
Items of Urgent Business
To determine any other items of business which
the Chairman decides should be considered as a matter of urgency
pursuant to Section 100B(4)(b) of the Local Government Act 1972
|
6. |
Members' Questions
To receive oral questions from Members, if
any
|
7. |
Recommendations from Cabinet Working Parties
Planning Policy & Built Heritage Working
Party
The following recommendations were made to
Cabinet at the meeting held on 9th October 2023:
To recommend to Cabinet that:
1. a. The
Blakeney Neighbourhood Plan be made (brought into force) as part of
the statutory Development Plan for North Norfolk in accordance with
section 38A(4) of the Planning and
Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 (as amended) as soon as practical and
within the 8 week statutory timeframe
b. The issuing of the Decision Statement required
under Regulation 19 of the Neighbourhood Planning (General) Regulations 2012 (as
amended) in order to bring to the attention of the qualifying body,
the people who live, work and or carry out business in the Neighbourhood
Plan Area is delegated to the Assistant Director of Planning in
conjunction with the Planning Policy TeamLeader;
2.
Acknowledge that the required consequential
amendments to the adopted policies map and the required minor
consequential changes to the referendum version of the
neighbourhood plan through delegated powers to the Planning Policy
Team Leader.
Decision:
Decision
RESOLVED
1. a. The
Blakeney Neighbourhood Plan be made (brought into force) as part of
the statutory Development Plan for North Norfolk in accordance with
section 38A(4) of the Planning and
Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 (as amended) as soon as practical and
within the 8 week statutory timeframe
b. The issuing of the Decision Statement required
under Regulation 19 of the Neighbourhood Planning (General) Regulations 2012 (as
amended) in order to bring to the attention of the qualifying body,
the people who live, work and or carry out business in the Neighbourhood
Plan Area is delegated to the Assistant Director of Planning in
conjunction with the Planning Policy TeamLeader;
2. Acknowledge that the required consequential amendments to the
adopted policies map and the required minor consequential changes
to the referendum version of the neighbourhood plan through
delegated powers to the Planning Policy Team Leader
|
8. |
Recommendations from Overview & Scrutiny Committee
To consider any recommendations referred to
the Cabinet by the Overview & Scrutiny Committee for
consideration by the Cabinet in accordance within the Overview and
Scrutiny Procedure Rules
|
9. |
Corporate Plan 2023 - 2027 - Annual Action Plan 2024/2025 PDF 144 KB
Executive Summary
|
This
report and accompanying appendix present the 2023 – 2027
Corporate Plan Action Plan for the period April 2024 – March
2025 to Cabinet for approval.
|
Options considered
|
The
actions detailed in the Action Plan have been developed in support
of the five themes in the adopted Corporate Plan through a series
of member/officer workshops, recognising the challenges and
opportunities facing the district and the Council over the next 18
months.
The
actions proposed seek to balance the capacity of the organisation
to deliver, taking into account the
staff and financial resources available to the Council and
potential to access external funding or partnership resources, with
the aspirations laid out in the Corporate Plan. In this respect it is recognised that there is a
degree of choice and prioritisation as to the actions proposed for
delivery in the period April 2024 – March 2025.
|
Consultation(s)
|
The
recent workshops involving elected members and officers have been
an inclusive and consultative process, the outcomes from which have
informed future priority actions and work programming by the
Cabinet for delivery in the 2024/25 civic year. These will need to be aligned with the 2024/25
budget preparation and revised Medium-Term Financial Strategy in
the coming weeks.
|
Recommendations
|
That
the Cabinet approves the Corporate Plan Annual Action Plan for
2024/25.
|
Reasons for
recommendations
|
Sound management of the authority’s staff, property and financial resources to deliver projects
and initiatives which support improved service delivery and
positive outcomes aligned to the previously agreed Corporate Plan
themes.
|
Background papers
|
2023 – 2027 Corporate
Plan
Notes from the recent themed
workshop events attached as appendices to this report
|
Links to key documents:
|
Corporate Plan:
|
This
report details the list of actions and proposals the Council
proposes taking forward in support of the five Corporate Plan
themes in the twelve months April 2024 – March
2025.
|
Medium Term Financial Strategy
(MTFS)
|
Proposed
actions, projects or initiatives will need to give due
consideration to the Council’s financial position as detailed
in finance reports and a revised Medium-Term Financial Strategy and
have the necessary resources allocated to them or efficiency
savings identified through the preparation of the 2024/25
budget.
|
Council Policies &
Strategies
|
See comment under Corporate Plan
heading above
|
Corporate Governance:
|
Is this a key
decision
|
Yes
|
Has the public interest test
been applied
|
Yes – there is no private or
confidential information to be considered by this report
|
Details of any previous
decision(s) on this matter
|
N/A
|
Additional documents:
Decision:
Decision
RESOLVED
To approve the Corporate Plan
Annual Action Plan for 2024/25, subject to one minor amendment in
‘Meeting our Housing Need’ section 3 (removal of the
word ‘two’)
Reason for the Decision:
Sound management of the
authority’s staff, property and
financial resources to deliver projects and initiatives which
support improved service delivery and positive outcomes aligned to
the previously agreed Corporate Plan themes.
|
10. |
Budget Monitoring P6 2023 - 2024 PDF 319 KB
Executive Summary
|
This
report provides an update on the Council’s financial
performance and projected outturn for 2023/24 for the revenue
account, capital programme and reserves statement as at the end of
September 2023.
The
overall position at the end of September 2023 shows a £1.685m
underspend for the net operating expenditure on the revenue
account, this is however an unadjusted position that does not
include any known variations e.g. the inclusion of the pay award
for 2023/24.
As
at 30 September 2023, the General Fund projected a deficit of
£0.515m for the full year 2023/24. This is after adjusting for
all known variations and full year forecasting by service
managers.
|
Options considered
|
This is an update report on the
Council’s financial position and so no other options were
considered.
|
Consultation(s)
|
Cabinet Member
Section 151 officer
Budget Managers
|
Recommendations
|
It
is recommended that Cabinet:
1)
Note the contents of the report and the current
budget monitoring position and note that officers will work
together to take action to reduce the overall projected deficit on
the General Fund at the year-end of 2023/24.
recommends to full Council that it
2)
Approves an additional capital budget of £58k
so that the work for the refurbishment of the Red Lion roof
(Cromer), the Art Deco Block roof and handrails (Cromer) and the
Chalet Block at Sheringham can be awarded as one contract. And that
approval be given to fund the additional expenditure from the Asset
Management Reserve.
3)
Approves an increase to the DFG capital budget of
£118k and approves that it is funded by the additional grant
received for this purpose from the Government.
4)
Approves the provision of a new play area at the
Lees in Sheringham and approves a capital project budget for this
of £65k and that funding for this should come from the
Delivery Plan Reserve.
5)
Approves the capital spending of £11k on the
Morris Street Car Park Boundary Wall and that it be funded from the
Asset Management Reserve.
6)
Approves that the £85k of the Car Park
refurbishment capital budget is reallocated to the Public
Conveniences so that the outstanding works can be carried out and
complete the scheme.
|
Reasons for recommendations
|
To
update members on the current budget monitoring position for the
Council.
|
Background papers
|
\\fs\Accounts\Budget Monitoring\BUDGET MONITORING\2023-24\Period
6\Report\Final Report & Appendicies\Budget Monitoring P6
2023-24 .doc
|
Wards
affected
|
All
|
Cabinet member(s)
|
Cllr Lucy Shires
|
Contact Officer
|
s151 Tina Stankley,
Tina.stankley@north-norfolk.gov.uk
|
|
|
|
Links to key documents:
|
Corporate Plan:
|
Budgets set to support the
Corporate Plan objectives.
|
Medium Term Financial Strategy
(MTFS)
|
Budget process in line with
MTFS
|
Council Policies &
Strategies
|
Service Budgets set in line
with the council policies and strategies.
|
Corporate Governance:
|
Is this a key
decision
|
no
|
Has the public interest test
been applied
|
Not an exempt item
|
Details of any previous
decision(s) on this matter
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional documents:
Decision:
Decision
RESOLVED
To recommend to Full Council
that it
1)
Approves an additional capital budget of £58k
so that the work for the refurbishment of the Red Lion roof
(Cromer), the Art Deco Block roof and handrails (Cromer) and the
Chalet Block at Sheringham can be awarded as one contract. And that
approval be given to fund the additional expenditure from the Asset
Management Reserve.
2)
Approves an increase to the DFG capital budget of
£118k and approves that it is funded by the additional grant
received for this purpose from the Government.
3)
Approves the provision of a new play area at the
Lees in Sheringham and approves a capital project budget for this
of £65k and that funding for this should come from the
Delivery Plan Reserve.
4)
Approves the capital spending of £11k on the
Morris Street Car Park Boundary Wall and that it be funded from the
Asset Management Reserve.
5)
Approves that the £85k of the Car Park
refurbishment capital budget is reallocated to the Public
Conveniences so that the outstanding works can be carried out and
complete the scheme.
Reason for the decision:
To update members on the
current budget monitoring position for the Council
|
11. |
Treasury Management Mid Year Report 2023/24 PDF 81 KB
Executive Summary
|
This report sets out the
Treasury Management activities undertaken during the first half of
the 2023/24 Financial Year compared with the Treasury Management
Strategy for the year.
|
Options considered
|
This report must be prepared to
ensure the Council is compliant with the CIPFA Treasury Management
and Prudential Codes.
|
Consultation(s)
|
Cabinet Member
Section 151 Officer
This report has been prepared
with the assistance of Link Treasury Services, the Council’s
Treasury advisors.
|
Recommendations
|
To
recommend to Full Council that the Treasury Management Mid Year Report 2023/24 is approved.
|
Reasons for recommendations
|
Approval by Full Council
demonstrates compliance with the Prudential Code to ensure adequate
monitoring of the capital expenditure plans and treasury management
activity.
It
is a requirement that any proposed changes to the 2023/24
prudential indicators are approved by Full Council.
|
Background papers
|
The Council’s Treasury
Management Strategy 2023/24.
|
Wards
affected
|
All
|
Cabinet member(s)
|
Cllr. Lucy Shires
|
Contact Officer
|
James Moore
|
Links to key documents:
|
Corporate Plan:
|
This report is required to ensure
the Council can demonstrate it is in a sound financial position and
able to deliver the projects in the Capital Programme which support
the Corporate Plan Objectives.
|
Medium Term Financial Strategy
(MTFS)
|
This report supports the MTFS in
confirming adequate financing is in place to deliver the
Council’s Capital Programme.
|
Council Policies &
Strategies
|
The Council’s Treasury
Management Strategy 2023/24
|
Corporate Governance:
|
Is this a key
decision
|
No
|
Has the public interest test
been applied
|
Not an exempt item.
|
Details of any previous
decision(s) on this matter
|
N/A
|
Additional documents:
Decision:
Decision
RESOLVED
To recommend to Full Council
that the Treasury Management Mid Year
Report 2023/24 is approved
Reason for the
decision:
Approval by Full Council
demonstrates compliance with the Prudential Code to ensure adequate
monitoring of the capital expenditure plans and treasury management
activity.
It
is a requirement that any proposed changes to the 2023/24
prudential indicators are approved by Full Council.
|
12. |
Council Tax Discounts & Premiums Determination 2024-25 PDF 136 KB
Executive
Summary
|
This report sets out the proposed level of council tax
discounts which shall apply to classes of dwelling for the
financial year 2024-25.
|
Options considered.
|
The recommendations enable the Council to
take action, as a result of the reforms
included in the Local Government Finance Act 2012 (as amended), to
encourage homeowners to bring their homes back into use and
generate council tax income.
|
Consultation(s)
|
The legislation provides local authorities with
the power to determine the level of council tax discount in
relation to certain classes of property. The Council must approve
its determinations for each financial year. The calculation of the
tax base for 2024/25 will be made on the assumption that the
determinations recommended below will apply.
In accordance with the relevant
legislation these determinations shall be published in at least one
newspaper circulating in North Norfolk before the end of the period
of 21 days beginning with the date of the
determinations.
|
Recommendations
|
Recommend to Full Council that under Section 11A
of the Local Government Finance Act 1992 and in accordance with the
provisions of the Local Government Finance Act 2012 and other
enabling powers that:
1)
The discounts for the year 2024-25 and beyond are
set at the levels indicated in the table at paragraph
3.1.
2)
To continue to award a local discount of 100% in
2024-25 for eligible cases of hardship under Section 13A of the
Local Government Finance Act 1992 (as amended). See the associated
policy in Appendix B.
3)
That an exception to the levy charges may continue
to be made by the Revenues Manager in the circumstances laid out in
section 3.2 of this report.
4)
The premiums for the year 2024-25 and beyond are set
at the levels indicated in the table at paragraph
4.2.
5)
To continue to award a local discount of 100% in
2024-25 for eligible cases of care leavers under Section 13A of the
Local Government Finance Act 1992 (as
amended).
6)
Those dwellings that are specifically identified under regulation
6 of the Council Tax (Prescribed Classes of Dwellings) (England)
Regulations 2003 will retain the 50% discount as set out in
paragraph 2.1 of this report.
7)
Those dwellings
described or geographically defined at Appendix A which in the
reasonable opinion of the Revenues Manager are judged not to be
structurally capable of occupation all year round and were built
before the restrictions of seasonal usage were introduced by the
Town and Country Planning Act 1947, will be entitled to a 35%
discount.
8)
The long-term empty-property premium of 100% is
brought forward to increase from 12 months rather than 24 months
from 1 April 2025, subject to the necessary
legislation.
9)
A new second homes premium of 100% as detailed in
paragraph 4.3 is applied from 1 April 2025, subject to the
necessary legislation.
|
Reasons for recommendations
|
To set appropriate council tax discounts and
premiums which will apply in 2024-25 and to raise council tax
revenue.
|
Background papers
|
Local
Authorities are ...
view the full agenda text for item 12.
|
Additional documents:
Decision:
Decision
RESOLVED
To recommend to Full Council
that under Section 11A of the Local Government Finance Act 1992 and
in accordance with the provisions of the Local Government Finance
Act 2012 and other enabling powers that:
1)
The discounts for the year 2024-25 and beyond are
set at the levels indicated in the table at paragraph
3.1.
2)
To continue to award a local discount of 100% in
2024-25 for eligible cases of hardship under Section 13A of the
Local Government Finance Act 1992 (as amended). See the associated
policy in Appendix B.
3)
That an exception to the levy charges may continue
to be made by the Revenues Manager in the circumstances laid out in
section 3.2 of this report.
4)
The premiums for the year 2024-25 and beyond are set
at the levels indicated in the table at paragraph
4.2.
5)
To continue to award a local discount of 100% in
2024-25 for eligible cases of care leavers under Section 13A of the
Local Government Finance Act 1992 (as amended).
6)
Those dwellings that are specifically
identified under regulation 6 of the Council Tax (Prescribed
Classes of Dwellings) (England) Regulations 2003 will retain the
50% discount as set out in paragraph 2.1 of this
report.
7)
Those dwellings
described or geographically defined at Appendix A which in the
reasonable opinion of the Revenues Manager are judged not to be
structurally capable of occupation all year round and were built
before the restrictions of seasonal usage were introduced by the
Town and Country Planning Act 1947, will be entitled to a 35%
discount.
8)
The long-term empty-property premium of 100% is
brought forward to increase from 12 months rather than 24 months
from 1 April 2025, subject to the necessary legislation.
9)
A new second homes premium of 100% as detailed in
paragraph 4.3 is applied from 1 April 2025, subject to the
necessary legislation.
Reason for the recommendation:
To set appropriate council tax
discounts and premiums which will apply in 2024-25 and to raise
council tax revenue.
|
13. |
Future of Emergency Phones PDF 399 KB
Executive Summary
|
Emergency phones are in place at 22 locations along the North
Norfolk coast from Morston to Horsey. Providing emergency
telephones on beaches is not a statutory requirement, however North
Norfolk’s have remained in place for over 30 years. Usage
data shows not a single emergency telephone anywhere along the
coast has been used for a documented emergency for many
years.
BT
have announced their move to digital by 2025 raising uncertainty
about the future viability of the emergency phones. Unfortunately BT have been unable to say one way or
another whether an alternative option will be available following
the change.
The
cost of keeping these phones operational is over £30k per
year. The necessity of providing these phones has now vastly
reduced and an opportunity to consider their future now exists.
|
Options considered
|
Option 1: Do nothing
and keep the phones in operation. This option will be affected by
the move to digital but we are not sure
exactly how at this stage as BT are unable to confirm if there will
be an alternative option following the change.
Option 2: Remove all
emergency phones from the districts
coastline.
Option 3: Remove only
the emergency phones where mobile phone signal is known to be
adequate, leaving those where signal is particularly poor. This
option will be affected by the move to digital but we are not sure exactly how at this
stage as BT are unable to confirm if there will be an alternative
option following the change.
|
Consultation(s)
|
Discussions have been held
internally within the Leisure Team and the IT
department.
Externally discussions have
been held with the RNLI and Coastguard, who showed no concern about
the proposal and indicated that they are reviewing their own
processes as a result of BT’s
digital move.
|
Recommendations
|
The Council takes the decision to remove all
Emergency Phones in the district.
|
Reasons for recommendations
|
1.1
It is proposed that
the necessity for Emergency Phones is no longer as important as it
once was. Their lack of use and the imminent move by BT to go
digital mean that we believe the requirement for these phones no
longer exists.
1.2
BT are unable to
provide assurances that an alternative to analogue lines will be
available to keep the emergency phones operational post
digitilisation. However they have given assurances that mobile phone
signal is being targeted for improvement throughout the
district.
1.3
The Council could make
a financial saving of over £30k per annum by removing this
service.
1.4
It is not deemed that
removal would cause significant community safety issues. Partners
such as the RNLI have been consulted and raised no concerns
either.
|
Background papers
|
NA
|
Wards
affected
|
Coastal, Sheringham South,
Beeston Regis and The Runtons, Cromer
Town, Suffield Park, Poppyland,
Mundesley, Bacton, Happisburgh, Hickling.
|
Cabinet member(s)
|
Cllr. Liz Withington
Cllr. Harry
Blathwayt
|
Contact Officer
|
Colin Brown, Leisure &
Locality Services Manager, 01263516001
|
Decision:
Decision
RESOLVED
To
agree to remove all Emergency Phones in the District
Reason for the decision:
1.1
It is proposed that
the necessity for Emergency Phones is no longer as important as it
once was. Their lack of use and the imminent move by BT to go
digital mean that we believe the requirement for these phones no
longer exists.
1.2
BT are unable to
provide assurances that an alternative to analogue lines will be
available to keep the emergency phones operational post
digitilisation. However they have given assurances that mobile phone
signal is being targeted for improvement throughout the
district.
1.3
The Council could make
a financial saving of over £30k per annum by removing this
service.
1.4
It is not deemed that
removal would cause significant community safety issues. Partners
such as the RNLI have been consulted and raised no concerns
either.
|
14. |
Stalham Sports Centre PDF 137 KB
Executive Summary
|
Stalham Sports Centre is one of three dual use community sports
centres operated on behalf of the Council by Everyone Active as
part of the current Leisure Contract. It has consistently been the
least well attended of the three sites and last calendar year only
received a little over 5000 visits. The Council budgets £17k
per annum for its share of maintenance and utility costs as per the
dual use agreement in place.
A
proposal has been made for the incumbent trust – Synergy
Multi Academy Trust – to take the operations of the site back
in-house. Everyone Active have indicated that they are open to this
transfer taking place and the Leisure Contract contains a clause
allowing it to happen.
|
Options considered
|
- To hand back the
operation of the Stalham dual use sports centre to the Synergy
Multi Acadmey Trust.
- To not hand back the operation of Stalham dual
use sport centre and for it to continue to be operated as part of
the NNDC leisure contract with Everyone Active.
|
Consultation(s)
|
Meetings with local ward
members for Stalham have been undertaken, alongside meetings with
Everyone Active, The Synergy Trust and the NNDC Communications
Manager.
|
Recommendations
|
Cabinet agrees to hand back operations of the Stalham dual use
sports centre to Synergy Multi Academy Trust and instruct the
Leisure and Locality Services Manager to undertake this
process.
|
Reasons for recommendations
|
The Council have been
approached by the Synergy Multi Academy Trust to operate Dual Use
Centre.
The council have put a lot of
resource into this site over a number of
years, both in-house and through a Leisure Operator. Neither have
been overly successful and therefore it is believed to be a good
option to allow the Academy themselves to operate the site for
community use.
|
Background papers
|
|
Wards
affected
|
Stalham
|
Cabinet member(s)
|
Cllr. L, Withington
|
Contact Officer
|
Colin Brown Leisure and
Localities Manager 01263 516001
Emily Capps- Assistant Director
for Environmental and Leisure Services
|
Links to key documents:
|
Corporate Plan:
|
Developing Communities
|
Medium Term Financial Strategy
(MTFS)
|
The proposal could generate a
saving to the Council of £17k per annum
|
Council Policies &
Strategies
|
N/A
|
Corporate Governance:
|
Is this a key
decision
|
Yes
|
Has the public interest test
been applied
|
N/A
|
Details of any previous
decision(s) on this matter
|
N/A
|
Decision:
Decision
RESOLVED
To agree to hand back
operations of the Stalham dual use sports centre to Synergy Multi
Academy Trust and instruct the Leisure and Locality Services
Manager to undertake this process.
Reason for the
decision:
The Council have been
approached by the Synergy Multi Academy Trust to operate Dual Use
Centre.
The Council has put a lot of
resource into this site over a number of years, both in-house and
through a Leisure Operator. Neither have been overly successful and
therefore it is believed to be a good option to allow the Academy
themselves to operate the site for community use
|
15. |
Annual Update - Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (RIPA) PDF 115 KB
Annual Update - Regulation of Investigatory Powers
Act 2000 (RIPA)
|
Executive Summary
|
The Council is
required to have a Policy for the use of powers under the
Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000
(RIPA).
Home Office
guidance recommends that elected members should review the use of
the RIPA powers and ensure the policy remains fit for purpose, at
least once per year.
Officers have
reviewed the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (RIPA)
Policy and Procedures document and made a
number of minor changes. These changes reflect references in
the document to relevant Codes of Practice and removed references
to a guidance document which has been withdrawn and not yet
replaced.
Officers have
reviewed the Internet & Social Media Research &
Investigations Policy and identified that no changes are necessary
at this time.
The Council has
made use of powers under RIPA on one occasion in the last 12
months.
|
Options
considered
|
The Policy is
required to ensure proper application of the Act, so there is not
an alternative option.
|
Consultation(s)
|
Consultation has
been undertaken with the Monitoring Officer, who also acts as the
Gatekeeper for RIPA activity.
|
Recommendations
|
- That
the amendments to the revised Regulation of Investigatory Powers
Act 2000 Policy and Procedures, set out at Appendix A, be
accepted.
- That
Members note that there are no amendments required to the Internet
& Social Media Research & Investigations
Policy
- That
Members note the activity undertaken under RIPA.
|
Reasons for
recommendations
|
The Council is
required to have an up to date
policy/procedure in order to exercise its powers.
Members are
required to be aware of the RIPA activity undertaken by the
Council.
|
Background
papers
|
None
|
Wards
affected
|
All
|
Cabinet
member(s)
|
Cllr Calum
Ringer
|
Contact
Officer
|
Steve Hems,
Director for Communities
01263
516192
Steve.hems@north-norfolk.gov.uk
|
Links to key documents:
|
Corporate
Plan:
|
This item does not directly relate to delivery of
the Corporate Plan objectives but is a statutory
requirement.
|
Medium Term
Financial Strategy (MTFS)
|
There is no direct impact on the Medium-Term
Financial Strategy.
|
Council Policies
& Strategies
|
NNDC Regulation of
Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (RIPA) Policy and
Procedures
NNDC Internet &
Social Media Research & Investigations Policy
|
Corporate Governance:
|
Is this a key
decision
|
No
|
Has the public
interest test been applied
|
Yes, not
exempt
|
Details of any
previous decision(s) on this matter
|
N/A
|
Additional documents:
Decision:
Decision
RESOLVED
To approve
- That the amendments to the revised Regulation of Investigatory
Powers Act 2000 Policy and Procedures, set out at Appendix A, be
accepted.
- That Members note that there are no amendments required to the
Internet & Social Media Research & Investigations
Policy
- That Members note the activity undertaken under
RIPA.
Reason for the decision:
The Council is required to have
an up to date policy/procedure in order
to exercise its powers.
Members are required to be
aware of the RIPA activity undertaken by the Council.
|
16. |
Net Zero Fast Followers programme
To receive a verbal update from Jonathan Ward
on the ‘Net Zero Fast Followers’ programme.
|
17. |
Exclusion of Press and Public
To pass the following resolution:
“That under Section 100A(4) of the Local
Government Act 1972 the press and public be excluded from the
meeting for the following item of business on the grounds that they
involve the likely disclosure of exempt information as defined in
paragraphs _ of Part I ofSchedule 12A (as amended) to the
Act.”
|
18. |
Private Business
|