Agenda, decisions and minutes

Cabinet - Monday, 12th April, 2021 10.00 am

Venue: remotely via Zoom. View directions

Contact: Emma Denny  Email: emma.denny@north-norfolk.gov.uk

Items
No. Item

53.

Announcement on the death of HRH the Duke of Edinburgh

Minutes:

The Chairman, Cllr Seward, opened the meeting by saying that it was with great sadness that we heard of the death of His Royal Highness Prince Phillip, the Duke of Edinburgh on Friday. He asked all Members to join him in observing a minutes’ silence.

 

The Chairman then said that on behalf of all Members and Officers of North Norfolk District Council he would like to express his deepest sympathies to Her Majesty The Queen and The Royal Family on the death of His Royal Highness, Prince Philip, The Duke of Edinburgh.

 

The legacy he left is enormous. The Duke of Edinburgh's Award, which he founded in 1956, has inspired generations of young people to help others and instilled in them a vision for citizenship and a desire to serve their communities and a trailblazer, ahead of his time championing conservation along with his commitment to raising awareness for the future of our planet.

 

As we move into the period of recovery from the pandemic, we will need fortitude and a deep sense of commitment to serving others.  Throughout his life, Prince Philip displayed those qualities in abundance. He concluded by asking Members to take inspiration from the example he provided.

 

54.

Minutes pdf icon PDF 207 KB

To approve, as a correct record, the minutes of the meeting of the Cabinet held on 15 March 2021.

Minutes:

The minutes of the meeting held on 15th March were approved as a correct record.

55.

Public Questions and Statements

To receive questions and statements from the public, if any.

Minutes:

None received.

56.

Items of Urgent Business

To determine any other items of business which the Chairman decides should be considered as a matter of urgency pursuant to Section 100B(4)(b) of the Local Government Act 1972

Minutes:

None received.

57.

Declarations of Interest pdf icon PDF 233 KB

Members are asked at this stage to declare any interests that they may have in any of the following items on the agenda. The Code of Conduct for Members requries that declarations include the nature of the interest and whether it is a disclosable pecuniary interest (see attached guidance and flowchart)

Minutes:

None.

58.

Members' Questions

To receive oral questions from Members, if any

Minutes:

None received.

59.

Recommendations from Planning Policy & Built Heritage Working Party

The following recommendation was made to Cabinet at the meeting of the Planning Policy & Built Heritage held on 22 March 2021:

 

Norfolk Strategic Planning Framework:

 

 

Recommendations:

 

1. That the Norfolk Strategic Planning Framework and Statement of Common Ground 2021 and the Agreements contained therein are endorsed by North Norfolk District Council

2. That the Council supports and welcomes the commitment to continued co-operative working and periodic review of the framework

3.  Subject to the inclusion of an improved agreement in relation to surface and foul water drainage

 

Decision:

Decision
RESOLVED:

 

Norfolk Strategic Planning Framework

 

 

 

 

1. That the Norfolk Strategic Planning Framework and Statement of Common Ground 2021 and the Agreements contained therein are endorsed by North Norfolk District Council

2. That the Council supports and welcomes the commitment to continued co-operative working and periodic review of the framework

3. Subject to the inclusion of an improved agreement in relation to surface and foul water drainage

 

Minutes:

The Portfolio Holder for Planning, Cllr J Toye, introduced this item. He explained that the Norfolk Strategic Planning Framework had been discussed in depth by the Working Party, and an additional recommendation had been agreed regarding surface and foul water drainage. Cllr A Fitch-Tillett, seconded the proposal, saying that she particularly supported the additional recommendation and welcomed closer co-operation on flooding issues.

 

It was proposed by Cllr J Toye, seconded by Cllr A Fitch-Tillett and

 

RESOLVED:

 

Norfolk Strategic Planning Framework

 

 

 

 

1. That the Norfolk Strategic Planning Framework and Statement of Common Ground 2021 and the Agreements contained therein are endorsed by North Norfolk District Council

2. That the Council supports and welcomes the commitment to continued co-operative working and periodic review of the framework

3. Subject to the inclusion of an improved agreement in relation to surface and foul water drainage

 

60.

Recommendations from Overview & Scrutiny Committee

To consider any recommendations referred to the Cabinet by the Overview & Scrutiny Committee for consideration by the Cabinet in accordance within the Overview and Scrutiny Procedure Rules.

 

The following recommendation was made to Cabinet at the meeting of the Overview & Scrutiny Committee held on 24th February:

 

NORTH NORFOLK DISTRICT COUNCIL EQUALITY, DIVERSITY AND INCLUSION STRATEGY 2021-2025

 

RESOLVED

 

To recommend that the Strategy, or Policy, is progressed through the next stages of development, subject to the consideration of amendments suggested by the Committee.

 

Decision:

DECISION

RESOLVED:

 

NORTH NORFOLK DISTRICT COUNCIL EQUALITY, DIVERSITY AND INCLUSION STRATEGY 2021-2025

 

That the Strategy, or Policy, is progressed through the next stages of development, subject to the consideration of amendments suggested by the Overview & Scrutiny Committee.

 

Minutes:

The Chairman of the Overview & Scrutiny Committee, Cllr N Dixon, introduced this item. He said that there had been a lengthy timeline, starting in December 2019, to get to this point and that the earlier version that had come forwards had not been ready for pre-scrutiny. He added that there had been a lot of discussion at the Overview & Scrutiny committee meeting about the change from a policy to a strategy and this had led to a lack of clarity over structural issues of content, all linked to the core purpose of the document. He said that there was still a lot of work to be done, hence the wording of the recommendation. He concluded by saying that this piece of work had taken considerable resource so far and he said that there could be merit in having a standard template that could be customised for future policy / strategy documents.

 

The Chairman thanked Cllr Dixon for his comments. He said that he noted the suggestion about a template and advised Members that officers were already working on including the amendments suggested by Overview & Scrutiny Committee into the revised Equality, Diversity and Inclusion Strategy with the aim of bringing it back to the next meeting of Cabinet for consideration.

 

RESOLVED:

 

NORTH NORFOLK DISTRICT COUNCIL EQUALITY, DIVERSITY AND INCLUSION STRATEGY 2021-2025

 

That the Strategy, or Policy, is progressed through the next stages of development, subject to the consideration of amendments suggested by the Overview & Scrutiny Committee.

 

61.

Recommendations from Governance, Risk & Audit Committee

The following recommendation was made to Cabinet by Governance, Risk & Audit Committee at the meeting held on 25th March 2021:

 

 

 North Norfolk District Council - Assurance Review of Cromer Sports Hub Project:

 

1. To recommend that all members of Cabinet receive a copy of the final report.

2. That Cabinet reviews the Council’s project governance framework to ensure that it is robust enough to address the concerns raised by the assurance review and by the Governance, Risk & Audit Committee.

 

 

 

Decision:

DECISION

RESOLVED:

 

North Norfolk District Council - Assurance Review of Cromer Sports Hub Project:

 

1. To recommend that all members of Cabinet receive a copy of the final report.

2. That Cabinet reviews the Council’s project governance framework to ensure that it is robust enough to address the concerns raised by the assurance review and by the Governance, Risk & Audit Committee.

 

 

Minutes:

The Chairman invited Cllr J Rest, Chairman of Governance, Risk & Audit Committee to introduce this item. Cllr Rest requested the Democratic Services Manager to read out the recommendations. He said that he had nothing further to add.

 

The Chairman confirmed all members of Cabinet had now received a copy of the final report and that a review of the project governance framework was considered and approved at the last meeting of Cabinet on 15th March.

 

Cllr V Gay said that work had already begun to address the recommendations arising from the Assurance Review of the Cromer Sports Hub Project. The Constitution Working Party, of which she was Chairman, had considered the Local Government Association (LGA) Model Councillor Code of Conduct at their meeting in February, and it was hoped that this would be adopted by the Council and across the Norfolk authorities. The new Code broadened the definition of Members’ interests.

 

The Constitution Working Party had also considered matters relating to contract procurement exemptions as these procedures were laid down within the Constitution. There was an ongoing audit review into this and the Working Party was due to receive an update on this at their meeting on 13th April. She concluded by saying the matter of members’ attendance at exempt/ private meetings of committees would also be considered at the meeting of the Working Party on 13th April.

 

RESOLVED:

 

North Norfolk District Council - Assurance Review of Cromer Sports Hub Project:

 

1. To recommend that all members of Cabinet receive a copy of the final report.

2. That Cabinet reviews the Council’s project governance framework to ensure that it is robust enough to address the concerns raised by the assurance review and by the Governance, Risk & Audit Committee.

 

 

62.

North Norfolk District Council's actions in the Recovery phase of the Coronavirus Pandemic pdf icon PDF 267 KB

Summary:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Options considered:

This report details the actions taken by North Norfolk District Council in responding to the ongoing Coronavirus Pandemic at a strategic, local and organisational level over the period December 2020 - March 2021.  Actions taken are outlined in the report.

 

These include:-

 

  • monitoring and responding to the rising number of local cases of COVID in the District during December 2020 and January 2021;
  • making payments of COVID business grants in respect of the Tier 4 lockdown in Norfolk from 26th December 2020 and then the third national lockdown from 4th January 2021;
  • supporting local health partners roll out delivery of the vaccine programme across North Norfolk;
  • development of advice and support for the staged re-opening of local businesses as per the national roadmap from 12th April, 17th May and 21st June;
  • preparing the District for the forthcoming visitor season through refreshing our “You are Welcome” reassurance programme, supported by social distancing measures, fogging of public toilets and other assets so as to provide as safe an environment for local residents and visitors as possible;
  • holding conversations with the Council’s staff about New Ways of Working beyond COVID capturing the benefits of remote working through maintaining customer service provision over the internet and telephone, whilst re-opening the offices to personal callers
  • participation in the Marie Curie National Day of Reflection by lighting up Cromer Pier in yellow lights;
  • holding discussions with the Norfolk Public Health Team to develop and deliver a programme of surveillance testing for local businesses over the coming months
  • continued to support twice weekly mobile testing facilities on Council car parks in Cromer, Fakenham and from early February in North Walsham
  • continued to participate in regular meetings of the Norfolk Health Protection Board and Norfolk Health Engagement Board arrangements which are monitoring, reviewing and responding to local outbreaks of Coronavirus in the county and in preparing for Recovery as lockdown restrictions are lifted in the coming months.

 

 

The Council’s response to the ongoing Coronavirus Pandemic has been led through regular meetings of its Local Co-ordination Group civil contingency arrangements which has considered options dynamically based on data on local case numbers and Government statements and announcements

 

Conclusions:

 

 

The report details the actions taken by the District Council during the period December 2020 – end of March 2021 in responding to the ongoing Coronavirus Pandemic, including supporting our local communities and businesses during the extended third all-England lockdown and working with partners to support delivery of the local vaccination programme and in preparing the District for the forthcoming visitor season which is expected to be very busy with large numbers of staycation and day visitors.

 

Recommendations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reasons for

Recommendations:

 

Cabinet is asked to note and comment upon the Council’s actions during the period December 2020 – end of March 2021 in responding to the ongoing Coronavirus Pandemic, including supporting businesses during the extended third all-England lockdown, working with partners to support delivery of the local vaccination programme and preparing the District  ...  view the full agenda text for item 62.

Minutes:

The Chairman invited the Chief Executive to introduce this item. He began by saying that following a peak in early January, the number of Covid infections had continued to fall steadily in North Norfolk, and in the rolling 7 days to 6th April 2021, there were 5.7 recorded cases in the District, per 100,000 population, ensuring that North Norfolk had one of the lowest rates of local authority areas in England.

 

At 25th March 2021, 66% of the District’s population over the age of 16 – some 61,100 people have had their first vaccination, meaning the District had one of the highest rates of vaccination nationally with many people in the oldest age cohorts and some health and social care staff now also receiving their second dose of the vaccine, giving increased protection from infection, severity of illness and hospitalisation.

 

Following the Government’s announcement regarding the roadmap out of lockdown, the Council had been supporting and advising local businesses on re-opening. Looking ahead, preparations were being made to accommodate large numbers of visitors to the District in the coming months. Demand for holiday lets was very strong at the moment. Consequently, the fogging of public conveniences would continue and additional COVID Support Officers were also being employed by the Council over the summer months, paid for through funding made available to the Norfolk Public Health Team’s Controlling Outbreak Management Fund budget. They would provide advice to businesses in the coming weeks and help with managing the high number of visitors over the summer.

 

The Chief Executive went onto say that officers were discussing with local partners whether additional temporary / peak season parking capacity could be provided in the key resort towns of Cromer, Sheringham and Wells and the provision of more litter bins, street and beach cleansing services. Additional support was also being provided to hospitality venues regarding the use of outdoor space. He added that good progress was being made regarding the local elections on 6th May 2021, so that polling stations could be fully Covid-safe.

 

He went onto say that the Council was holding discussions with the Norfolk Public Health Team about a programme of asymptomatic surveillance testing for owners and staff of local businesses in the retail, tourism and hospitality sectors over the coming months as these sectors employed large numbers of staff in younger age groups unlikely to receive a vaccine until the mid to late summer.  Regular Lateral Flow Testing of this workforce would therefore give confidence to business owners and customers.

 

The Chairman invited comments and questions.

 

Cllr J Toye thanked all of the officers who continued to work tirelessly putting effective preparations in place for an influx of visitors.

 

Cllr R Kershaw said that he had been working with the Chief Executive and Gold Command for the last few months and he was impressed by how quickly the District Council had responded to requests from the Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) and Public Health England. He agreed that the planning  ...  view the full minutes text for item 62.

63.

UK Community Renewal Fund pdf icon PDF 237 KB

Summary:

 

 

 

 

Options considered:

This report outlines opportunities presented to North Norfolk through the Government’s new UK Community Renewal and Levelling Up programmes and outlines how the Council might seek to position itself to take advantage of theseopportunities.

 

It is considered that these new funding programmes present opportunities to secure external funding for the District to support the Council’s Corporate Plan objectives through the Council acting in its community leadership role. Alternatively, the Council could leave it to other local stakeholders to develop project proposals but it is believed that this might not realise the full benefits of a more co- ordinated approach proposed by the Council as outlined in thereport.

Conclusions:

The Council should seek to adopt a strategic leadership role in seeking to co-ordinate the development of a programme of projects at North Walsham and Fakenham for submission to Government under the UK Community Renewal and, as appropriate, the Levelling Up Fund programmes

Recommendations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reasons for Recommendations:

Cabinet is ask to:-

 

·      note the opportunities presented to North Norfolk by the new UK Community Renewal and Levelling Upprogrammes

·      endorse the proposals made that a programme of complementary projects be developed in respect of the future planned growth of North Walsham and Fakenham as sustainable locations for future housing and business development at scale supported by provision of key transport, health, education community and green infrastructure and submitted to the County Council as lead body for endorsement and onward submission to theGovernment

·      to agree that in developing any proposals the Council establishes a Strategic Stakeholder Board and Steering Groups for North Walsham and Fakenham to support project development and oversee programmedelivery

 

To realise opportunities to secure UK Government fundinginto NorthNorfolk tosupport investmentin projects which meet priorities outlined in the Council’s Corporate Plan as they relate toprovision of housing, economic growth, environment and climate change.

 

Cabinet Member(s)

Cllr Sarah Butikofer, Leader of the Council

Ward(s) affected All

 

 

Contact Officer, telephone number and email:

Steve Blatch, Chief Executive

Email:- steve.blatch@north-norfolk.gov.uk Tel:- 01263 516232

 

 

Decision:

DECISION

RESOLVED

 

To agree that in developing any proposals, the Council establishes a Strategic Stakeholder Board and Steering Groups for North Walsham and Fakenham to support project development and oversee programmedelivery

 

Reason for the decision:

 

To realise opportunities to secure UK Government fundinginto NorthNorfolk tosupport investmentin projects which meet priorities outlined in the Council’s Corporate Plan as they relate toprovision of housing, economic growth, environment and climate change

 

Minutes:

The Chairman introduced this item. He said that the Government had announced  two new funding programmes were announced - the UK Community Renewal Fund and the Levelling Up Fund, which were now being promoted as a fore-runner of the UK Shared Prosperity Fund to be launched in 2022. North Norfolk was one of 100 priority areas able to submit proposals forfunding through the UK Community Renewal Fund. Four areas in Norfolk were eligible to bid for funding from an overall ‘pot’ of £220m. Projects with a value of up to £3 million could be supported per area, with 90% of the funding for revenue spend and spend to be incurred by 31st March2022. Locally in Norfolk, the programme will be led by the CountyCouncil, with bids for project funding to be submitted by lead authorities by 18th June 2021.

 

The Chairman said that it was important that NNDC seized this opportunity and work with the County Council and local MPs on this project. He added that it was a long-term project that would get the preparatory work underway in the growth towns of Fakenham and North Walsham, increasing the opportunity of future funding from other streams such as the ‘Levelling Up’ fund.

 

The Chief Executive said that this was a big opportunity for the Council. Many other eligible authorities already had strategic boards in place as they had been involved previously in similar schemes such as the Future High Streets fund. NNDC did not have anything similar in place and there was therefore a recommendation to establish a  Strategic Stakeholder Board and Steering Groups for North Walsham and Fakenham to support project development and oversee programmedelivery. These should be established as a matter of priority so that key partners were aware of the opportunities and could endorse proposals before the submission was put to the County Council in May 2021. He went onto say that North Walsham and Fakenham had been identified for strategic growth within the Council’s Local Plan. The Council’s funding bid would seek to build upon proposals for new housing and economic growth to be accommodated at scale at these locations through new Urban Extensions supported by good quality community infrastructure – including new link roads, health and education facilities, leisure and green infrastructure and business investment / employment opportunities, which would also support the extensive rural hinterlands to both towns.

 

Cllr R Kershaw, Portfolio Holder for Economic Development, thanked the Chief Executive for the speed in which he had pulled the report together.

 

Cllr C Cushing said that, as a local member for Fakenham, he welcomed the proposals. He asked the Chief Executive for more information on the Strategic Board and the Steering Groups, specifically who would be appointed to them and their roles and the deadline for when they would be up and running. The Chief Executive replied that the Strategic Board would operate at a district-wide level. It would involve lead members from the political groups, the two  ...  view the full minutes text for item 63.

64.

Fakenham Urban Extension - A148 Roundabout pdf icon PDF 327 KB

Summary:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Options considered:

This report requests a capital funding contribution to support with the early delivery of key infrastructure in respect of the Fakenham Urban Extension proposals being developed by Trinity College in Fakenham under outline planning application PO/17/0680. The current proposals for the site include the delivery of up to 1,380 new homes delivered in 2 phases, the first of which would see the construction of 950 homes. It also includes provision of a school site and commercial hub.

 

The contribution being sought is £0.9m, to be used as match funding against 2 successful external funding bids from the Norfolk Business Rates Pool (£0.5m) and the Norfolk Strategic Fund (£0.4m) to give a total scheme contribution of £1.8m.

 

This project proposes to fund the construction of a roundabout on the A148 and associated infrastructure (yet to be agreed), which will act as a catalyst for the commencement of the Urban Expansion of Fakenham. This key element of the site infrastructure will begin to address the lack of viability and de-risk the site for house builders.

 

This contribution towards the scheme will increase the allocation of affordable housing from the currently agreed level of 16.5% to approximately 17.5% although at the present time this is still subject to final agreement.

 

Please note that this proposal is for a total scheme contribution of £1.8m to deliver initial elements of the site infrastructure (including the roundabout on the A148) and not to deliver the full scheme which is estimated to require investment of c£282m, of which total site infrastructure costs are in the region of £25m.

 

The Council could take the decision not to invest the £0.9m match funding but it would then not be possible to draw down the external funding of £0.9m which has been secured.

 

 

Conclusions:

 

 

This combined funding of £1.8m will help to significantly re-risk the site for house builders giving them confidence to develop the site to support the delivery of up to 1,380 new homes on the site delivered in 2 phases the first of which would see the construction of 950 homes. This key element of the site infrastructure will begin to address the lack of viability also unlocks the delivery of the school site and commercial hub providing confidence to home buyers that a new community is being built as well as the homes, this is equally important to house builders as there is no recent track record of estate development of new homes in Fakenham. Strong oversight of the development by the Council will ensure the timely development of the site.

 

 

Recommendations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reasons for

Recommendations:

 

Cabinet are asked to approve;

 

1.            Agree a capital budget of £1.8m to support the enabling infrastructure works and to release of £0.9m match funding from the Delivery Plan Reserve as the Council’s match funding element, with the balance of the funding to be provided externally through the Norfolk Business Rates Pool (£0.5m) and the Norfolk Strategic Fund (£0.4m).

 

To support the viability and early delivery of housing  ...  view the full agenda text for item 64.

Additional documents:

Decision:

DECISION

RESOLVED:

 

To agree a capital budget of £1.8m to support the enabling infrastructure works and to release of £0.9m match funding from the Delivery Plan Reserve as the Council’s match funding element, with the balance of the funding to be provided externally through the Norfolk Business Rates Pool (£0.5m) and the Norfolk Strategic Fund (£0.4m).

 

Reason for the recommendation:

 

To support the viability and early delivery of housing through the Fakenham Urban Extension.

 

Minutes:

The Chairman invited the Chief Executive to introduce this item. He said thatthe project proposed to fund the construction of a roundabout on the A148 and associated infrastructure (yet to be agreed), which would act as a catalyst for the commencement of the Urban Expansion of Fakenham. He explained that £0.5m had been agreed from the Norfolk Business Rates Pool, to be match funded by NNDC (£0.5m), which gave an initial capital pot of £1m. The second bid submission for a further £0.4m had also now been approved from the Norfolk Strategic Fund and required further match funding from NNDC of £0.4m and would bring the total capital pot, subject to NNDC match funding approval, to £1.8m. Based on the potential capital contribution of £1.8m and the anticipated delivery of the A148 roundabout scheme within the next 18 – 24 months, that the affordable housing contribution rate could increase to around from the current level of 16.5% to 17.5%/18.5% (subject to finalisation and agreement) as it would address any concerns regarding a lack of viability and de-risk the site for house builders.

 

Cllr Cushing welcomed the proposals. He asked whether the delivery of the scheme was dependent on the sale of the land by Trinity College first, in order to develop the infrastructure, or could it be developed separately. The Chief Executive replied that he understood that the land would be sold in tranches and delivered in phases and that the roundabout could therefore be developed separately first.

 

Cllr J Rest said that he welcomed the proposals and the early delivery of the scheme as it showed that the Council was committed to the wider development of the site.

 

It was proposed by Cllr R Kershaw , seconded by Cllr N Lloyd and

 

RESOLVED:

 

To agree a capital budget of £1.8m to support the enabling infrastructure works and to release of £0.9m match funding from the Delivery Plan Reserve as the Council’s match funding element, with the balance of the funding to be provided externally through the Norfolk Business Rates Pool (£0.5m) and the Norfolk Strategic Fund (£0.4m).

 

Reason for the recommendation:

 

To support the viability and early delivery of housing through the Fakenham Urban Extension.

 

65.

Information, Advice & Advocacy Service pdf icon PDF 249 KB

Summary:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Options Considered

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Council has for many years provided funding to support the provision of Information, Advice & Advocacy (IAA) in North Norfolk. Historically IAA services in the district have been delivered by Citizens Advice

 

A joint funding agreement with Norfolk County Council (NCC) for the delivery of IAA services in North Norfolk by Norfolk Citizens Advice (Norfolk CA) ended on 31st March 2020.

 

Cabinet resolved not to extend the contract and to review the IAA service prior to agreeing funding for the financial year 1.4.2020 – 31.3.2021.

 

The review took place in December 2020. In spite of the Covid 19 restrictions, Norfolk CA has continued to provide IAA services, therefore the full grant for the period 2020 / 2021 was awarded.

 

Funding of IAA of £66,710 is identified in the base budget towards the provision of IAA services in North Norfolk. Having considered the outcome of the review, a decision needs to be made as to the future allocation of IAA funding.

 

1.     To award the full IAA budget of £66,710 to Norfolk CA for the provision of IAA services in North Norfolk.

 

This option is not recommended:

 

Norfolk CA provides generic IAA services which are valued and of benefit to many residents in North Norfolk. However, the age profile data from Norfolk CA shows minimal use of the service by young people under age 18 who can have specific age related IAA needs. There are also residents who due to their personal circumstances require specialist IAA support which Norfolk CA cannot always provide.

 

To increase equity, a proportion of the IAA budget should be allocated to other Voluntary Community Social Enterprise (VCSE) organisations that provide specialist IAA support to residents who due to their age or personal circumstances these residents may not access Norfolk CA.

 

As a result of the pandemic there has been a significant increase in the use of both phone and digital media to access IAA services.

The continuation of face to face IAA services in outreach locations where data shows use is low will cease thus reducing service costs

 

2.     To award a conditional grant of £55,000 to Norfolk CA towards the provision of generalist IAA services in North Norfolk. This would include the continuation of existing face to face services at dedicated offices in North Walsham, Holt and at an agreed venue in Fakenham.

 

This option is recommended:

 

The remainder of the IAA budget (11,710 will be offered to identified VCSE organisations who provide IAA services in North Norfolk to young people under the age of 18 and / or who provide specialist IAA support to people due to their complex personal circumstances are unable to access or be supported by the range of generic services offered by Norfolk CA.

 

There would be no reduction in the total IAA budget offered to VCSE organisations. The allocation of the remaining budget would be used more flexibly and equitably. This will ensure that funding from NNDC is used to provide IAA services to all  ...  view the full agenda text for item 65.

Decision:

DECISION

RESOLVED:

 

1.    To award a conditional grant of £55,000 to Norfolk CA towards for the provision of generic IAA services in North Norfolk.

 

2.    In consultation with the portfolio Holder for Culture & Wellbeing to award the remainder of the IAA budget (£11,710) to identified VCSE organisations to enhance IAA services to young people in North Norfolk and / or a VCSE organisation that provides specialist IAA support to residents in North Norfolk who may not be able to access or be supported by generic services IAA services.

 

NCC are currently undertaking a comprehensive review of the IAA services they commission. This will result in a tender process and recommissioned countywide IAA services with potentially different service providers from 1st April 2022. Until the outcome of the tender process is known it is considered that the NNDC IAA grants should only be awarded for one year from 1st April 2021.to 31st March 2022.

 

Reason for the recommendation;

 

To ensure the IAA funding awarded by the Council enables the continuation of generic IAA services in North Norfolk.

 

To preserve a face to face generalist Advice Service in designated locations across District.

 

To ensure the IAA funding awarded by the Council contributes towards the provision of specialist IAA services to young people and / or residents in North Norfolk such as who may not be able to access or be supported by generic IAA services. 

 

The allocation of NNDC IAA funding from 1st April 2021 – 31st March 2022 will enable future provision of IAA services in North Norfolk to complement recommissioned NCC services

 

Minutes:

Cllr V Gay, Portfolio Holder for Wellbeing, introduced this item. She explained that a review of the Information, Advice and Advocacy (IAA) services delivered in North Norfolk by Norfolk Citizens Advice (CA) took place in December 2020. The review highlighted areas of concern which needed to be addressed and which it was felty could influence the amount of funding offered to Norfolk CA in the future.

 

The intention was to continue to provide the service across the District, maintaining the face to face service whilst addressing the lack of engagement with young people, as this had been very low.The funding proposals for Norfolk CA would therefore ensure the continuation of face to face IAA services in three key towns across North Norfolk. It will also contribute towards the expansion of the phone and digital offer which will all benefit residents in North Norfolk. She explained that the reduction in Norfolk CA service costs as a result of ceasing outreach services in areas of low use would enable NNDC to offer funding to other Voluntary, community and social enterprise (VCSE) organisations that provide specialist IAA support to young people or those who were unable to access support by Norfolk CA’s  generic IAA service.

 

Cllr Gay concluded by saying that Norfolk CA were supportive of this approach and were fully committed to continue working in partnership with NNDC in the delivery of IAA services. She thanked them for their input.

 

It was proposed by Cllr V Gay, seconded by Cllr J Toye and

 

RESOLVED:

 

1.     To award a conditional grant of £55,000 to Norfolk CA towards for the provision of generic IAA services in North Norfolk.

 

2.     In consultation with the portfolio Holder for Culture & Wellbeing to award the remainder of the IAA budget (£11,710) to identified VCSE organisations to enhance IAA services to young people in North Norfolk and / or a VCSE organisation that provides specialist IAA support to residents in North Norfolk who may not be able to access or be supported by generic services IAA services.

 

NCC are currently undertaking a comprehensive review of the IAA services they commission. This will result in a tender process and recommissioned countywide IAA services with potentially different service providers from 1st April 2022. Until the outcome of the tender process is known it is considered that the NNDC IAA grants should only be awarded for one year from 1st April 2021.to 31st March 2022.

 

Reason for the recommendation;

 

To ensure the IAA funding awarded by the Council enables the continuation of generic IAA services in North Norfolk.

 

To preserve a face to face generalist Advice Service in designated locations across District.

 

To ensure the IAA funding awarded by the Council contributes towards the provision of specialist IAA services to young people and / or residents in North Norfolk such as who may not be able to access or be supported by generic IAA services. 

 

The allocation of NNDC IAA funding from 1st April 2021 – 31  ...  view the full minutes text for item 65.

66.

Public Space Protection Orders (PSPOs) Review & Consultation: Dog Restrictions on Beaches, Promenades and Wider District pdf icon PDF 539 KB

Summary:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Options considered:

On the 8February 2016,Cabinet resolved that reviewsofexistingandrequestsfornewPublicSpace Protection Orders (PSPOs) will be considered by Cabinetafter appropriateconsultation has been completed.

In April 2017 following a wide consultation, Cabinet approved officer recommendations to authorise a number of PSPOs, including 8 orders regarding beaches and proms and a single order to prohibit dog fouling on public land across the North Norfolk District Council area.

These specific orders officially became live on May 1st 2018 and are due to expire on the 1st May 2021. In view of the importance of these orders the Council is recommending a continuation of the orders for a further 3 years.

 

 

  • Cabinetto approve officer recommendationswith no changes or amendments.

 

  • Cabinetto amendofficer recommendationsbased on consultation comments.

 

Conclusions:

 

All the PSPOs identified in this report are due to expire on the 1st of May 2021. These orders are of fundamental importance to allow the continuation of dog enforcement activities along our beaches and proms, together with preventing and enforcing dog fouling on all public land in the District. Without these orders in place the Council has no authority to legally enforce.  

 

Recommendations:

 

 

 

Reasons for

Recommendations:

 

That Cabinet approve the renewal of all those PSPO’s within this report.

 

 

  • Without these orders in place the Council has no authority to legally enforce in these areas. All the areas specified in this report are fundamental to the protection and enjoyment of the districts public spaces, specifically the beach and promenade areas. 
  • The PSPOs are instrumental in maintaining the recognised quality of the district’s bathing areas, this includes supporting the Blue Flag designations. The criteria for awarding a Blue Flag states that “Dogs must be excluded from the award area of the beach during bathing season”.
  • Although we have a legal duty under the regulations to consult, our decision to continue with the order does not represent a change, and thus the consultation responses identified in the 2017 Cabinet report still have relevance. On these grounds and in view of their importance, it would be prudent to approve the continuation of the orders.

 

LIST OF BACKGROUND PAPERS AS REQUIRED BY LAW

(Papers relied on to write the report, which do not contain exempt information and which are not published elsewhere)

 

Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014 – Part 4, Chapter 2, sections 59- 75

 

Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014: Reform of anti-social behaviour powers: Statutory guidance for frontline professionals – Home Office July 2014

 

Dealing with irresponsible dog ownership: Practitioner’s manual – DEFRA October 2014

 

Antisocial Behaviour Crime and Policing Act - Powers and Duties – NNDC Cabinet report January 2015

 

Public Space Protection Orders – NNDC Cabinet report February 2016

 

Public Space Protection Orders - NNDC Cabinet Report April 2017

 

 

 

Cabinet Member(s)

Nigel Lloyd

 

Ward(s) affected

All Wards

Contact Officer, telephone number and email:

 

Emily Capps, Assistant Director of Environmental and Leisure Services

emily.capps@north-norfolk.gov.uk

01263 516274  ...  view the full agenda text for item 66.

Decision:

DECISION

RESOLVED:

 

That Cabinet approve the renewal of all those PSPO’s within the report.

 

Reasons for the decision:

 

  • Without these orders in place the Council has no authority to legally enforce in these areas. All the areas specified in this report are fundamental to the protection and enjoyment of the districts public spaces, specifically the beach and promenade areas. 
  • The PSPOs are instrumental in maintaining the recognised quality of the district’s bathing areas, this includes supporting the Blue Flag designations. The criteria for awarding a Blue Flag states that “Dogs must be excluded from the award area of the beach during bathing season”.
  • Although we have a legal duty under the regulations to consult, our decision to continue with the order does not represent a change, and thus the consultation responses identified in the 2017 Cabinet report still have relevance. On these grounds and in view of their importance, it would be prudent to approve the continuation of the orders.

 

 

Minutes:

Cllr N Lloyd, Portfolio Holder for Environmental Services, introduced this item. He explained that in April 2017 cabinet approval was granted regarding the creation of a number of PSPOs across the district, following a wide consultation process. Included in these proposals were 8 orders regarding the prohibition of dogs off leads and bans on beaches in all of the District’s main beach and promenade areas. In addition, a single order was granted to prohibit dog fouling on all public land in North Norfolk.

 

The 9 orders (identified in section 1.3 of the report) became live on May 1st 2018 and were due to expire on the 1st May 2021. In accordance with section 60 of the Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014 the Council could continue and renew orders for a further 3 years if sufficient justification exists to do so. Included in this was a requirement to consult on the Councils intentions. Cllr Lloyd explained that the consultation would occur between 29th March 2021 and 18th of April 2021. The consultation was open to all the public, local Town and Parish Councils, NNDC members, Local MPs, and relevant County Councillors. He concluded by saying that there were no proposals to change the existing orders as it was felt that they worked well in enforcing and controlling dog activity.

 

Cllr Hayman, in seconding the recommendations, said that they were very timely as the District opened up again following lockdown. He said that it was important that dog owners respected and recognised these orders as the Council wanted to show that the District was clean and safe.

 

The Chairman said that the banning of dogs on beaches was crucial to the maintaining of the Blue Flag status on several beaches.

  

It was proposed by Cllr N Lloyd, seconded by Cllr G Hayman and

 

RESOLVED:

 

That Cabinet approve the renewal of all those PSPO’s within the report.

 

Reasons for the decision:

 

  • Without these orders in place the Council has no authority to legally enforce in these areas. All the areas specified in this report are fundamental to the protection and enjoyment of the districts public spaces, specifically the beach and promenade areas. 
  • The PSPOs are instrumental in maintaining the recognised quality of the district’s bathing areas, this includes supporting the Blue Flag designations. The criteria for awarding a Blue Flag states that “Dogs must be excluded from the award area of the beach during bathing season”.
  • Although we have a legal duty under the regulations to consult, our decision to continue with the order does not represent a change, and thus the consultation responses identified in the 2017 Cabinet report still have relevance. On these grounds and in view of their importance, it would be prudent to approve the continuation of the orders.

 

 

67.

Council Activity in Relation to the Regulation of Regulatory Powers Act 2000 (RIPA) pdf icon PDF 125 KB

Summary:

 

 

 

 

Options considered:

This report provides an update for members on the use by the Council of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (RIPA).

 

 

Update report only

 

 

 

 

Recommendations:

 

 

 

 

 

Reasons for

Recommendations:

 

Members are asked to note the activities undertaken under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 and the outcome of the recent Investigatory Powers Commissioner's Office inspection.

 

Members are required to be aware of the RIPA activity undertaken by the Council.

 

Cabinet Member(s)

Cllr J Toye

 

Ward(s) affected

All

Contact Officer, telephone number and email:

Steve Hems, 01263 516182, Steve.hems@north-norfolk.gov.uk

 

 

 

Minutes:

The Chairman invited the Director for Communities to introduce the report. He explained that it provided an update for members on the use by the Council of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (RIPA). The Act required that the Council published a policy and procedures for its activities in this area, which laid out a framework for authorising certain methods of surveillance which may be necessary during activity undertaken by the Council. This requirement was discharged through the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 Policy and Procedures document (“the Policy”)

 

The Council was required to keep the Policy under review and was subject to periodic inspection in relation to this and any authorised activity by an external body. He added that the external body had changed since the last update to members from the Office of the Surveillance Commissioners (OSC) to Investigatory Powers Commissioner's Office (IPCO).

 

Since the last update report to members there had been no authorisations issued for the use of either Covert Human Intelligence Sources (CHIS) or Directed Surveillance (DS) activities as there were no applications made during the period.

 

The Director for Communities went onto explain that following an inspection by the OSC in 2017 the Policy was updated to cover all of the points raised during that inspection and to reflect accepted good practice contained in the government guidance and relevant codes of practice. The Policy contained a number of defined roles against which specific officers were named. A number of staff named in these roles left the Council in late 2019 and early 2020 and, whilst temporary arrangements to retain compliance were put in place, it was identified that further training was required to enable offices fulfilling these roles to be competent. This training was booked for May 2020, however due to Covid19 restrictions it had to be postponed, with subsequent attempts to rebook during the year thwarted by further restrictions or Trainer availability. This training had now been rebooked for 27th/28th May 2021 both for those new to specific roles and some general refresher training for those officers who need awareness of the regulations.

 

As part of the package offered by the training firm, they conducted a review of the Policy documentation and identified any areas where the document could be improved to reflect current best practice or any legislative changes. The delay to the delivery of training had also delayed this work, as they were typically delivered at the same time. The Policy would therefore be updated at the end of May 2021.

 

AGREED

 

To note the activities undertaken under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 and the outcome of the recent Investigatory Powers Commissioner's Office inspection

 

 

 

68.

Disposal of a Property pdf icon PDF 124 KB

Summary:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Options considered:

The Council acquired a property under a voluntary arrangement following non-compliance of an Urgent Works Notice under section 54 Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Area) Act (1990)

 

Following a feasibility study and options appraisal, Officers supported a disposal of the property.  In accordance with the Councils Disposal policy, the property has since been advertised for sale on the open market seeking offers from potential purchases. 

 

Subsequently an offer has been received and is outlined in the exempt appendix.

 

A feasibility study and options appraisal considered a number of alternative options which would require significant financial investment and resource. 

 

Conclusions:

 

Following the property having being advertised for sale on the open market an offer has been received.  The acceptance of this offer will result in a requirement for the purchaser to complete works to the property as outlined in the Urgent Repairs Notice and will bring the property back into habitable use.

 

Recommendations:

 

 

Reasons for

Recommendations:

 

It is recommended to Cabinet to approve the disposal of the property as outlined in the exempt appendix.

 

The disposal is in accordance with the Council’s Disposal policy and the offer is deemed to be the best consideration reasonably obtainable.

 

Cabinet Member(s)

Cllr E Seward

 

Ward(s) affected

Walsingham

Contact Officer, telephone number and email:

Renata Garfoot, Asset Strategy Manager, 01263 516086

Renata.garfoot@north-norfolk.gov.uk

 

 

Additional documents:

Decision:

DECISION

RESOLVED:

 

It is recommended to Cabinet to approve the disposal of the property as outlined in the exempt appendix.

 

Reason for the decision:

 

The disposal is in accordance with the Council’s Disposal policy and the offer is deemed to be the best consideration reasonably obtainable.

 

Minutes:

The Chairman reminded members that the report and appendix was exempt and if they wished to discuss it in detail they would need to go into private business. He asked the Monitoring Officer to update Cabinet on the situation regarding the purchase. She informed them that the Council had acquired a property under a voluntary arrangement following non-compliance of an Urgent Works Notice under section 54 Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Area) Act (1990). Following a feasibility study and options appraisal, Officers supported a disposal of the property.  In accordance with the Councils Disposal policy, the property had since been advertised for sale on the open market seeking offers from potential purchases and an offer had been received some time ago and there was no information to suggest that there was any uncertainty about moving forwards.

 

It was proposed by Cllr E Seward, seconded by Cllr R Kershaw and

 

RESOLVED:

 

To approve the disposal of the property as outlined in the exempt appendix.

 

Reason for the decision:

 

The disposal is in accordance with the Council’s Disposal policy and the offer is deemed to be the best consideration reasonably obtainable.

 

69.

Exclusion of Press and Public

To pass the following resolution:

“That under Section 100A(4) of the Local Government Act 1972 the press and public be excluded from the meeting for the following item of business on the grounds that they involve the likely disclosure of exempt information as defined in paragraphs _ of Part I ofSchedule 12A (as amended) to the Act.”

70.

Private Business