Agenda, decisions and minutes

Cabinet - Tuesday, 6th May, 2025 10.00 am

Venue: Council Chamber - Council Offices. View directions

Contact: Emma Denny  Email: emma.denny@north-norfolk.gov.uk

Items
No. Item

1.

Minutes pdf icon PDF 128 KB

To approve, as a correct record, the minutes of the meeting of the Cabinet held on 31st March 2025.

Minutes:

The minutes of the meeting held on 31st March were approved and signed as a correct record by the Chairman.

2.

Public Questions and Statements

To receive questions and statements from the public, if any.

Minutes:

None.

3.

Declarations of Interest pdf icon PDF 721 KB

Members are asked at this stage to declare any interests that they may have in any of the following items on the agenda. The Code of Conduct for Members requries that declarations include the nature of the interest and whether it is a disclosable pecuniary interest (see attached guidance and flowchart)

Minutes:

Cllr W Fredericks declared a non-pecuniary interest regarding Agenda item 10.

4.

Items of Urgent Business

To determine any other items of business which the Chairman decides should be considered as a matter of urgency pursuant to Section 100B(4)(b) of the Local Government Act 1972

Decision:

Decision

RESOLVED

 

To note that the Chief Executive had taken a decision under delegated authority  to appoint the Deputy S151 Officer on a temporary basis as S151 Officer for the month of May, whilst interim arrangements are made to cover the designation with another local authority in Norfolk, pending advertising and recruiting a new Director of Resources.

 

Reason for the decision:

 

The Council is required to have a S151 Officer as this is a statutory role.

 

 

Minutes:

 

The Chairman informed members that there was one item of urgent business regarding the appointment of a temporary S151 Officer.

 

Following the Council’s Director of Resources leaving the authority at the end of April, it is necessary for the Council to appoint, under Section 151 of the Local Government Act 1972, a Chief Finance Officer.

 

The Council’s Deputy Section 151 Officer, Daniel King, Assistant Director of Finance and Assets has advised that whilst appropriately qualified this isn’t a responsibility he would wish to take on permanently so early in his career.  He has therefore agreed to take on the statutory role for the month of May, whilst interim arrangements are made to cover the designation with another local authority in Norfolk, pending advertising and recruiting a new Director of Resources.

 

A report on the appointment of an interim Section 151 Officer resource will be prepared for the Full Council meeting of the 21st May 2025.  In the meantime, Daniel King will take on this responsibility, supported by deputies Jenny Carroll, Chief Group Accountant and Claire Waplington, Chief Technical Accountant.

 

The above arrangements have been put in place under delegation to the Chief Executive exercising urgency provisions, as advised by the Monitoring Officer.

 

It was RESOLVED

 

To note that the Chief Executive had taken a decision under delegated authority  to appoint the Deputy S151 Officer on a temporary basis as S151 Officer for the month of May, whilst interim arrangements are made to cover the designation with another local authority in Norfolk, pending advertising and recruiting a new Director of Resources.

 

Reason for the decision:

 

The Council is required to have a S151 Officer as this is a statutory role.

 

 

5.

Members' Questions

To receive oral questions from Members, if any

Minutes:

The Chairman advised that questions could be raised throughout the meeting.

6.

Recommendations from Overview & Scrutiny Committee

To consider any recommendations referred to the Cabinet by the Overview & Scrutiny Committee for consideration by the Cabinet in accordance within the Overview and Scrutiny Procedure Rules:

 

There were no recommendations made to Cabinet by the Overview & Scrutiny Committee at the meeting held on 9th April 2025.

Minutes:

The Chairman of the Overview & Scrutiny Committee, Cllr N Dixon, confirmed that there were no recommendations to Cabinet at this time.

7.

Reporting progress implementing Corporate Plan 2023-27 Action Plan 2024-25 - to end of Quarter 4 - 31 March 2025 pdf icon PDF 232 KB

Executive Summary

The Corporate Plan 2023-27 Action Plan 2024-25 is being implemented as planned

Options considered

 

Not relevant.

 

Consultation(s)

The lead officer for each action in the Plan has been asked for their assessment of progress, identify issues and propose action they will take to address those issues.

 

Recommendations

 

Cabinet is recommended to note this report.

Reasons for recommendations

 

The progress report shows that nineteen of the actions are in progress and on track and eighteen completed. No actions are identified as red and seven actions are identified as amber.

Background papers

 

Corporate Plan 2023-27

Annual Action Plan 2024-25

 

 

 

Wards affected

All

Cabinet member(s)

Cllr Tim Adams

Contact Officer

Steve Hems, Director for Communities and Chair of the Performance and Productivity Oversight Board

Email:- steve.hems@north-norfolk.gov.uk

 

 

 

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Chairman introduced this item. He explained that the purpose of this report was to present an update on the progress being made in implementing the Corporate Plan 2023-27 Action Plan 2024-25 and to give Cabinet an opportunity to discuss and agree decisions that should be taken regarding any issues raised. He said that nineteen of the actions were in progress and on track and eighteen completed. No actions were identified as red and seven actions were identified as amber. He then, addressed the actions in turn, highlighting achievements and challenges.  He reminded members that two items had been cancelled due to the pressures placed on the Council by local government reorganisation (LGR).

 

The Chairman invited members to speak:

 

Cllr V Holliday welcomed the progress set out in the report. She said that residents in her ward had expressed some frustration regarding mobile phone and internet connectivity and she was concerned that time may be running out to address some of these issues. Cllr J Toye, Portfolio Holder for Sustainable Growth said that it was not down to the District Council to deliver on this action but engagement with key stakeholders was important and the evidence base clearly showed that there was a difference in delivery across the district and this needed to be addressed. There was very little information provided by the installation companies as to why some areas had reduced provision and this made it hard to explain the disparity to residents. He said that officers were working hard to improve this and to address some of the misinformation that was currently being shared. He said that members could assist with this by providing feedback and evidence from their residents.

 

Cllr Holliday said that a timeframe would be helpful and although she acknowledged that emergency calls could still be made in ‘not spot’ areas, payment transactions could not and this had an impact on daily life. She said that she was supportive of engaging proactively with the telecom providers to ensure that any mast installations were beneficial to the community and reflected their needs. She was supportive of anything that could be done to improve a joined-up approach. Cllr Toye agreed, adding that any evidence he could present to providers to demonstrate where the most pressing needs lay, would be beneficial in supporting this. In conclusion, he said he hoped to contact key stakeholders within the next month.  

 

The Chief Executive said that the Council’s role in this matter was essentially one of lobbying and raising key questions. He said that members may want to consider whether this was one of the main issues that should be highlighted as the Combined Mayoral Authority took shape, as it would be an issue that would cover a much larger area. The Chairman agreed that this would be a matter of focus for the new Mayoral authority.

 

Cllr C Cushing referred to Action 27, which referred to ‘working with partners in Fakenham to retain banking and post office services in the  ...  view the full minutes text for item 7.

8.

Procurement of vehicles and containers for a weekly food waste collection service pdf icon PDF 232 KB

 

Executive Summary

 

This report outlines the requirement to commence the procurement process for new vehicles, caddies and bins for the collection of food waste across the District.

 

This is to be delivered by Serco on behalf of the Council.

 

Options considered

 

Procurement of the vehicles, caddies and bins with delegated authority for the Director of Communities to award contracts as necessary provided the costs are within the allocated budget.

Commence procurement of the vehicles, caddies   and bins but with approval from Cabinet once procurement process has been completed. This option is not recommended as the delay may result in vehicle orders being pushed back further in the supply chain resulting in a further delay in implementing the new service.

Not to progress the procurement of vehicles or equipment associated with the delivery of a food waste service. This option is not recommended as it is in breach of the legislation and could result in legal action being taken against the Council.

 

Consultation(s)

Not applicable

 

Recommendations

 

To give delegated authority to the Corporate Director of Communities and The Section 151 officer (in consultation with the Portfolio Holder for IT Environmental and Waste Services and the Portfolio Holder Finance, Estates and Property Services) to pursue the procurement of Vehicles and equipment required to deliver a separate weekly food waste collection service in the area of North Norfolk District Council.

 

 

Reasons for recommendations

 

To ensure compliance with the introduction of a new legislation

Background papers

 

None

 

 

 

Wards affected

All

Cabinet member(s)

Cllr C Ringer

Contact Officer

Emily Capps – Assistant Director Environmental and Leisure Services – 01263 516274

 

 

Decision:

Decision:

RESOLVED

 

To give delegated authority to the Corporate Director of Communities and The Section 151 officer (in consultation with the Portfolio Holder for IT Environmental and Waste Services and the Portfolio Holder Finance, Estates and Property Services) to pursue the procurement of Vehicles and equipment required to deliver a separate weekly food waste collection service in the area of North Norfolk District Council.

 

Reason for the decision:

 

To ensure compliance with the introduction of a new legislation

Minutes:

 

 

The Chairman invited the Portfolio Holder for Environmental Services and Waste, Cllr C Ringer, to introduce this item.

 

Cllr Ringer began by saying that following Full Council’s approval to add the procurement of vehicles and equipment required to deliver a separate weekly food waste collection service in the area of North Norfolk District Council to the capital programme for 2025/26, Cabinet was now requested to delegate authority to the Corporate Director of Place and Section 151 officer in consultation with the Portfolio Holder for IT Environmental and Waste Services and the Portfolio Holder Finance, Estates and Property Services to pursue the procurement of equipment required to deliver a separate weekly food waste collection service in the district.

 

The Chairman invited members to speak:

 

Cllr W Fredericks sought clarification on the decision being made and said it was not about the number of vehicles being purchased.

 

It was proposed by Cllr C Ringer, seconded by Cllr T Adams and

 

RESOLVED

 

To give delegated authority to the Corporate Director of Communities and The Section 151 officer (in consultation with the Portfolio Holder for IT Environmental and Waste Services and the Portfolio Holder Finance, Estates and Property Services) to pursue the procurement of Vehicles and equipment required to deliver a separate weekly food waste collection service in the area of North Norfolk District Council.

 

Reason for the decision:

 

To ensure compliance with the introduction of a new legislation

9.

North Norfolk Visitor Centre Letting pdf icon PDF 706 KB

Executive Summary

Following the Cabinet decision 20/01/25 to cease operation of the visitor information provision at the North Norfolk Visitor Centre (NNVC) and advertise it to let.

 

This report has been prepared to allow Cabinet to review the offers received for the property and make a decision on its future use.

 

Following advertising of the premises on the open market, eight bids were received for the lease of NNVC.  Due diligence has been undertaken on each of these bids with Proposal 1 being considered to offer the best financial consideration and offers wider social and economic benefits to the district. If Proposal 1 does not progress it is recommended options 2-8 should be reconsidered.

 

 

Options considered

 

A variety of bids with different use options have been received and considered in detail.

 

  1. Proposal 1 (Dentist) outlined in the exempt Appendix A would demonstrate best financial consideration in accordance with s.123 Local Government Act 1972 and is the option recommended by officers

 

  1. The remaining proposals are not considered to present the best financial consideration. They should however be considered in the event that the lease for Proposal 1 is not secured.

 

An alternative option to dispose of the premises was considered and discounted due to the lettable space forming part of the public convenience which the Council wishes to retain and the potential for the space to generate a good level of rental income.

 

Consultation(s)

Cllr Lucy Shires - Portfolio Holder for Finance, Estates & Property Services.

Cllr Tim Adams- Leader of the Council - Portfolio Holder for Executive Support & Legal Services.

Tina Stankley- Director for Resources & S151 Officer

Cara Jordan - Monitoring Officer

Steve Blatch – Chief Executive

 

Recommendations

 

Resolution for Cabinet to approve:

 

  • Approval to enter into the lease set out Proposal 1 as outlined in the Exempt Appendix A which demonstrates best consideration and in accordance with s123 of the LGA Act 1972, with delegated approval granted to the Asset Strategy Manager to agree the exact terms for the legal agreement.
  • Approval to grant delegated approval to the Portfolio Holder for Finance, Estates & Property Services in consultation with The Chief Executive to enter into one of Proposals 2-8 in the event that Proposal 1 does not proceed.

 

Reasons for recommendations

 

 

Leasing the property utilises the space made available by ceasing the tourist information centre provision generating income that can be used to fund Council Services.

 

Granting delegated approval to the Portfolio Holder for Finance, Estates & Property Services in consultation with The Chief Executive to enter into one of Proposals 2-8 in the event that Proposal 1 does not proceed allows a decision to be made in the event that neither Proposal 1 does not progress to avoid unnecessary delay.

 

Background papers

 

NA

 

 

 

Wards affected

Cromer Town being the ward in which the property is located, but the future use has the potential to impact on surrounding wards and the wider district.

 

Cabinet member(s)

Cllr Lucy Shires

Contact Officer

Milo Creasey (Surveyor)

Renata Garfoot (Estates and Asset Strategy Manager)

 

 

Decision:

Decision

RESOLVED to approve

 

  • To enter into the lease set out Proposal 1 as outlined in the Exempt Appendix A which demonstrates best consideration and in accordance with s123 of the LGA Act 1972, with delegated approval granted to the Asset Strategy Manager to agree the exact terms for the legal agreement.
  • To grant delegated approval to the Portfolio Holder for Finance, Estates & Property Services in consultation with The Chief Executive to enter into one of Proposals 2-8 in the event that Proposal 1 does not proceed.

 

Reason for the decision:

 

Leasing the property utilises the space made available by ceasing the tourist information centre provision generating income that can be used to fund Council Services.

 

Minutes:

The Chairman introduced this item in the Portfolio Holder’s absence. He reminded members that there were exempt appendices and the meeting would need to go into closed session if any matters within these documents were discussed.

 

He began by explaining that  decision was taken by Cabinet on 21th January 2025 to cease operation of the visitor information provision at the North Norfolk Visitor Centre (NNVC) in Cromer and advertise it to let. This report had been prepared to allow Cabinet to review the offers received for the property and to make a decision on its future use.

 

Eight bids had been received for the lease of NNVC.  Due diligence had been undertaken on each of these bids with Proposal 1 being considered to offer the best financial consideration as well as wider social and economic benefits to the district. If Proposal 1 did not progress it was recommended options 2-8 should be reconsidered.

 

He reassured members that investment was still being made in support of tourism promotion and this was evidenced by the increase in visitor usage of the Council’s car parks during April. He said that displays and artefacts relating to the Deep History Coast project would be donated to the Sheringham Museum.

 

The Chairman said that there had been a lot of interest in the site and it was reassuring to see so many businesses keen to invest in Cromer. However, in terms of service provision it was felt that an NHS-backed dentist would present the most advantageous outcome for residents.

 

The Chairman invited members to speak:

 

Cllr J Toye welcomed the proposals and said he was reassured by the reference in section 3.2 of the report which said that officers had ‘assessed the bids for best consideration taking into account the requirements of Section 123 of the Local Government Act 1972 and the General Disposals Consent Order 2003 which considers issues of economic, social and environmental well-being’.

 

Cllr A Fitch-Tillett sought confirmation that it would be an NHS dentist. The Chairman said that it was NHS backed and would be valuable in the local context. Cllr Fitch-Tillett welcomed this and said that Cromer in particular lacked a full dentistry offer, with even the private practices being full.

 

The Chairman confirmed that it was a reputable company with several successful practices in operation. He added that if, for any reason, this option did not proceed then there were several other bids that could be considered. He added that the public toilets which were based in the building, would remain operational.

 

Cllr J Boyle, spoke as the local member for Cromer. She said that it had been challenging to lose the tourist information centre but she said that as the Council’s representative on the Norfolk Health Overview & Scrutiny Committee (NHOSC), dentistry was one of the biggest problems in the County and this presented the best outcome for local residents.

 

It was proposed by Cllr T Adams, seconded by Cllr J Toye and

 

RESOLVED to approve

 

10.

Exclusion of Press and Public

To pass the following resolution:

“That under Section 100A(4) of the Local Government Act 1972 the press and public be excluded from the meeting for the following item of business on the grounds that they involve the likely disclosure of exempt information as defined in paragraphs 3 of Part I of Schedule 12A (as amended) to the Act.”

 

Information in this appendix involves the likely disclosure of exempt information as defined in paragraph 3, Part 1 of schedule 12A (as amended) to the Local Government Act 1972.

 

This paragraph relates to:

           

Para 3.  Information relating to the financial or business affairs of any particular person (including the authority holding that information)

           

The public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosure for the following reasons:

 

The information is commercially sensitive, relating to commercial options being considered by the authority. Releasing this information would be likely to have a prejudicial impact upon third parties as well as the Council in obtaining best value.

 

 

11.

Private Business

Exempt Appendices A & B – North Norfolk Visitor Centre Letting.

Additional documents: