Venue: Council Chamber - Council Offices. View directions
Contact: Matt Stembrowicz Email: matthew.stembrowicz@north-norfolk.gov.uk
No. | Item |
---|---|
TO RECEIVE APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE Minutes: Apologies were received from Cllr P Butikofer. |
|
SUBSTITUTES Minutes: Cllr A Brown substituted for Cllr P Butikofer. |
|
PUBLIC QUESTIONS To receive public questions, if any. Minutes: None received. |
|
ITEMS OF URGENT BUSINESS To determine any items of business which the Chairman decides should be considered as a matter of urgency pursuant to section 100B(4)(b) of the Local Government Act 1972. Minutes: None received. |
|
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST PDF 721 KB Members are asked at this stage to declare any interests that they may have in any of the following items on the agenda. The code of conduct for Members requires that declarations include the nature of the interest and whether it is a disclosable pecuniary interest. Minutes: None declared. |
|
To approve as a correct record, the minutes of the public part meeting of the Governance, Risk & Audit Committee held on 30 March 2022 Minutes: Public minutes of the meeting held on 30th March 2022 were approved as a correct record and signed by the Chairman. |
|
EXCLUSION OF THE PRESS AND PUBLIC To pass the following resolution, if necessary:
a. That under section 100A(4) of the Local Government Act 1972 the press and public be excluded from the meeting for the following items of business on the grounds that they involve the likely disclosure of exempt information as defined in paragraph 1 & 2, Part 1 of schedule 12A (as amended) to the Act, and:
b. That the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosure for the following reasons:
Agenda Items Paragraph of Part 1 Schedule 12A 8 and 9 1 & 2
Information relating to any individual or information which is likely to reveal the identity of an individual and the public interest in maintaining this exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosure
Minutes: It was proposed by Cllr A Brown and seconded by Cllr H Blathwayt that under section 100A(4) of the Local Government Act 1972 the press and public be excluded from the meeting for the following items of business on the grounds that they involve the likely disclosure of exempt information as defined in paragraph 1 & 2, Part 1 of schedule 12A (as amended) to the Act, and that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosure for the following reasons.
RESOLVED
That under section 100A(4) of the Local Government Act 1972 the press and public be excluded from the meeting for the following items of business on the grounds that they involve the likely disclosure of exempt information as defined in paragraph 1 & 2, Part 1 of schedule 12A (as amended) to the Act. |
|
Exempt Minutes To approve as a correct record, the exempt minutes from the private part of the meeting of the Governance, Risk & Audit Committee held on 30th March 2022. Minutes: Discussion of the exempt minutes from 30th March 2022 is included within the exempt minutes appendix. |
|
Desk Top Review of Formal Employment Processes, so as to improve corporate learning For Governance, Risk & Audit Committee to review and consider the desk top review. Minutes: Discussion of the Desktop Review of Form Employment Processes is included within the exempt minutes appendix.
*The meeting returned to public session to agree resolutions*
i. The Chairman confirmed that the Committee had voted to approve the exempt minutes from the meeting held on 30th March 2022.
ii. The Chairman noted that the Committee had received the Desktop Review and had acknowledged some weaknesses in the process and advice in relation to the disciplinary process. He added that the Committee considered that this had been addressed by training and a strengthening of the procurement and exemption procedure, as per the management response of 30th March 2022. The statement was proposed by Cllr H Blathwayt and seconded by Cllr S Penfold, with the Committee voting five in favour and one against.
iii. The Chairman noted that the second recommendation was that the Constitution Working Party consider the separation of roles of those presenting, advising and investigating disciplinary matters in consultation with HR and the ACAS requirements. The recommendation was proposed by Cllr A Brown and seconded by Cllr H Blathwayt, with the Committee voting unanimously in favour.
iv. The Chairman noted that the final recommendation was for the Council to write to the Secretary of State to express its concerns that the EY audit process took an excessive period of time. The recommendation was proposed by Cllr S Penfold and seconded by Cllr H Blathwayt, with the Committee voting unanimously in favour.
v. Cllr N Dixon was provided with an opportunity to make a statement as an observer of the meeting, and stated for the record that the first recommendation raised sincere concerns that it had ducked key issues and left many serious questions unanswered, whilst not following the spirit or letter of the Nolan Principles, which had been engaged in the matters discussed.
vi. Cllr S Penfold asked whether the dates needed to be tightened up for the letter to the Secretary of State, to which the CE replied that the letter would relate specifically to the audit of the period from May-December 2019, which would equate to an eighteen month delay. It was suggested that the times concerned would be addressed fully within the letter sent to the Secretary of State.
vii. Cllr C Cushing stated that he had voted against the first recommendation as he felt that there were matters that had still not been addressed, and because he felt that the Nolan Principles had not been upheld as expected.
RESOLVED
1. That the Committee received the Desktop Review and had acknowledged some weaknesses in the process and advice in relation to the disciplinary process. The Committee considered that this had been addressed by training and a strengthening of the procurement and exemption procedure, as per the management response of 30th March 2022.
2. That the Constitution Working Party consider the separation of roles of those presenting, advising and investigating disciplinary matters relating to statutory officers (following confirmation from HR that this does not breach ... view the full minutes text for item 23. |